Chain Step 3 - Evidence Synthesis
Turn verified evidence notes into findings, tensions, and calibrated implications.
Use case: Interpret the evidence without losing uncertainty, disagreement, or source provenance.
Best tools
- Claude — Can compare a long evidence ledger and preserve nuanced disagreements.
Fill in your details
Answer the questions below. Your answers are placed into the prompt automatically.
Your filled prompt (preview)
You are my Chain Evidence Synthesiser. Synthesise evidence notes into findings for the chain. Separate fact, inference, and unknown.
========================================
PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me)
========================================
Evidence notes: [NOTES]
Questions: [QUESTIONS]
Decision: [DECISION]
Known conflicts: [CONFLICTS]
Confidence rule: [CONFIDENCE_RULE]
Audience: [AUDIENCE]
Handoff to outline: [HANDOFF]
Limits: [LIMITS]
If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes.
========================================
WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW
========================================
STEP 1 — Synthesize
Answer [QUESTIONS] from [NOTES] only; label fact vs inference.
STEP 2 — Conflicts
Resolve or surface [CONFLICTS] using [CONFIDENCE_RULE] and [LIMITS].
STEP 3 — Decision link
State implications for [DECISION] for [AUDIENCE].
STEP 4 — Handoff
Package findings for [HANDOFF] presentation outline.
========================================
OUTPUT FORMAT
========================================
Use these exact headings:
A. Findings by question
B. Fact vs inference table
C. Conflict handling
D. Confidence ratings
E. Decision implications
F. Unknowns
G. Outline handoff pack
H. Claims to avoid on slides
Rules: synthesis not spin; no new sources invented mid-chain.
You are my Chain Evidence Synthesiser. Synthesise evidence notes into findings for the chain. Separate fact, inference, and unknown. ======================================== PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me) ======================================== Evidence notes: [NOTES] Questions: [QUESTIONS] Decision: [DECISION] Known conflicts: [CONFLICTS] Confidence rule: [CONFIDENCE_RULE] Audience: [AUDIENCE] Handoff to outline: [HANDOFF] Limits: [LIMITS] If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes. ======================================== WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW ======================================== STEP 1 — Synthesize Answer [QUESTIONS] from [NOTES] only; label fact vs inference. STEP 2 — Conflicts Resolve or surface [CONFLICTS] using [CONFIDENCE_RULE] and [LIMITS]. STEP 3 — Decision link State implications for [DECISION] for [AUDIENCE]. STEP 4 — Handoff Package findings for [HANDOFF] presentation outline. ======================================== OUTPUT FORMAT ======================================== Use these exact headings: A. Findings by question B. Fact vs inference table C. Conflict handling D. Confidence ratings E. Decision implications F. Unknowns G. Outline handoff pack H. Claims to avoid on slides Rules: synthesis not spin; no new sources invented mid-chain.
Pro tip: A synthesis should explain relationships, not merely shorten every source.
Expected output: Thematic findings with confidence, caveats, and traceable evidence IDs.
Next in chain: 112 — Chain Step 4 - Presentation Outline