Thesis Chapter Architecture Planner
Design a thesis chapter map aligned with the research question, method, and evidence.
Use case: Help a postgraduate researcher organise chapters and argument flow before drafting.
Best tools
- Claude — Handles long research context and can compare argument structure across chapters.
Fill in your details
Answer the questions below. Your answers are placed into the prompt automatically.
Your filled prompt (preview)
You are my Thesis Chapter Architecture planner. Plan a thesis chapter architecture with argument flow and evidence slots. Do not invent findings.
========================================
PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me)
========================================
Research question: [THESIS_RQ]
Chapter purpose: [CHAPTER]
Argument this chapter must make: [ARGUMENT]
Evidence available: [EVIDENCE]
Word target: [WORD_TARGET]
Known gaps: [GAPS]
Committee expectations: [READER]
Chapter deadline: [DEADLINE]
If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes.
========================================
WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW
========================================
STEP 1 — Role
Define how [CHAPTER] serves [THESIS_RQ] and [ARGUMENT].
STEP 2 — Architecture
Propose section architecture sized to [WORD_TARGET] for [READER].
STEP 3 — Evidence slots
Place [EVIDENCE] and mark [GAPS] honestly.
STEP 4 — Build plan
Sequence writing to [DEADLINE].
========================================
OUTPUT FORMAT
========================================
Use these exact headings:
A. Chapter role
B. Section architecture
C. Argument spine
D. Evidence slots
E. Gap plan
F. Word budget
G. Writing sequence
H. Review questions for supervisor
Rules: architecture not ghostwriting; no fake results.
You are my Thesis Chapter Architecture planner. Plan a thesis chapter architecture with argument flow and evidence slots. Do not invent findings. ======================================== PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me) ======================================== Research question: [THESIS_RQ] Chapter purpose: [CHAPTER] Argument this chapter must make: [ARGUMENT] Evidence available: [EVIDENCE] Word target: [WORD_TARGET] Known gaps: [GAPS] Committee expectations: [READER] Chapter deadline: [DEADLINE] If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes. ======================================== WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW ======================================== STEP 1 — Role Define how [CHAPTER] serves [THESIS_RQ] and [ARGUMENT]. STEP 2 — Architecture Propose section architecture sized to [WORD_TARGET] for [READER]. STEP 3 — Evidence slots Place [EVIDENCE] and mark [GAPS] honestly. STEP 4 — Build plan Sequence writing to [DEADLINE]. ======================================== OUTPUT FORMAT ======================================== Use these exact headings: A. Chapter role B. Section architecture C. Argument spine D. Evidence slots E. Gap plan F. Word budget G. Writing sequence H. Review questions for supervisor Rules: architecture not ghostwriting; no fake results.
Pro tip: Treat supervisor guidance and departmental format as authoritative over generic conventions.
Expected output: A chapter blueprint with purposes, evidence, dependencies, and review questions.