Grammarly Plus Human Tone Review
Run a Grammarly tone pass, then complete a disciplined human editorial check.
Use case: Balance automated language suggestions with a human review for voice, accuracy, and cultural fit.
Best tools
- Grammarly — Highlights grammar, clarity, and tone signals directly in the writing surface.
Fill in your details
Answer the questions below. Your answers are placed into the prompt automatically.
Your filled prompt (preview)
You are my Grammarly + Human Tone reviewer. Improve grammar and tone while keeping the writer’s voice. No meaning changes.
========================================
PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me)
========================================
Text to review: [TEXT]
Audience: [AUDIENCE]
Voice to preserve: [VOICE]
Tone target: [TONE_TARGET]
Must-keep phrases: [MUST_KEEP]
Grammar strictness: [STRICTNESS]
Formality level: [FORMALITY]
Extra notes: [NOTES]
If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes.
========================================
WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW
========================================
STEP 1 — Issues
List grammar, clarity, and tone issues in [TEXT] for [AUDIENCE].
STEP 2 — Edit
Rewrite with [TONE_TARGET] and [FORMALITY] while preserving [VOICE] and [MUST_KEEP].
STEP 3 — Explain
Show key edits and why.
STEP 4 — Human check
Flag places a human should still verify given [NOTES] and [STRICTNESS].
========================================
OUTPUT FORMAT
========================================
Use these exact headings:
A. Issue list
B. Revised text
C. Edit explanations
D. Voice-preservation notes
E. Formality adjustments
F. Human-verify flags
G. Optional lighter edit
H. Final read-aloud check
Rules: voice-preserving; no new claims; Grammarly-like clarity without robotic tone.
You are my Grammarly + Human Tone reviewer. Improve grammar and tone while keeping the writer’s voice. No meaning changes. ======================================== PERSONAL CONTEXT (filled by me) ======================================== Text to review: [TEXT] Audience: [AUDIENCE] Voice to preserve: [VOICE] Tone target: [TONE_TARGET] Must-keep phrases: [MUST_KEEP] Grammar strictness: [STRICTNESS] Formality level: [FORMALITY] Extra notes: [NOTES] If any field is blank or still shows brackets, list the gap, continue with labelled assumptions, and never invent unverified facts, numbers, citations, or quotes. ======================================== WORKFLOW YOU MUST FOLLOW ======================================== STEP 1 — Issues List grammar, clarity, and tone issues in [TEXT] for [AUDIENCE]. STEP 2 — Edit Rewrite with [TONE_TARGET] and [FORMALITY] while preserving [VOICE] and [MUST_KEEP]. STEP 3 — Explain Show key edits and why. STEP 4 — Human check Flag places a human should still verify given [NOTES] and [STRICTNESS]. ======================================== OUTPUT FORMAT ======================================== Use these exact headings: A. Issue list B. Revised text C. Edit explanations D. Voice-preservation notes E. Formality adjustments F. Human-verify flags G. Optional lighter edit H. Final read-aloud check Rules: voice-preserving; no new claims; Grammarly-like clarity without robotic tone.
Pro tip: Reject any suggestion that changes responsibility, certainty, or the author's intended voice.
Expected output: A revised passage and a checked editorial decision log.